wxxx24
BONSUNA FOORUM
 Language:
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

TRANSLATE POSTS TO ENGLISH (google translate)
NB! FOORUMIS PILTIDE NÄGEMISEKS PEATE OLEMA SISSELOGITUD!
NB! YOU MUST "LOG IN" TO SEE ALL PICTURES!

-40 -50% Coco
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 36   Go Down

Author Topic: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.  (Read 89689 times)

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #480 on: August 15, 2017, 12:46:15 »


http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Abstract/publishahead/Effects_of_Creatine_and_Carbohydrate_Loading_on.97135.aspx
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #481 on: August 15, 2017, 21:24:04 »


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26187233  A 2-Year Randomized Controlled Trial of Human Caloric Restriction: Feasibility and Effects on Predictors of Health Span and Longevity.


RESULTS:
Body mass index averaged 25.1 (range: 21.9-28.0 kg/m(2)). Eighty-two percent of CR and 95% of AL participants completed the protocol. The CR group achieved 11.7±0.7 %CR (mean ± standard error) and maintained 10.4±0.4% weight loss. Weight change in AL was negligible. RMR residual decreased significantly more in CR than AL at 12 months (p = .04) but not 24 months (M24). Core temperature change differed little between groups. T3 decreased more in CR at M12 and M24 (p < .001), while tumor necrosis factor-α decreased significantly more only at M24 (p = .02).

CR had larger decreases in cardiometabolic risk factors and in daily energy expenditure adjusted for weight change, without adverse effects on quality of life.
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #482 on: August 18, 2017, 19:24:00 »

http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Abstract/2017/09000/Athletes_Intending_to_Use_Sports_Supplements_Are.15.aspx


Conclusions: Information about a harmful supplement worsened repeat sprint performance (a mean nocebo effect), whereas information about a beneficial supplement did not improve performance (no mean placebo effect was observed). However, participants' intention to use sport supplements influenced the direction and magnitude of subsequent placebo responses, with participants intending to use supplements more likely to respond to the positive intervention.

Kui sa oled "sportlane", kes kasutab lisandeid, lased sa end platseebost rohkem mõjutada ("usud", et "see toimiski")
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #483 on: August 18, 2017, 22:47:49 »

Plant vs. Animal Proteins for Muscle Anabolism?
Here’s a great, concise summary of the literature in the area on the topic by David Hamilton, Oliver Witard & Luc van Loon - https://goo.gl/fAk7Lf
For a more detailed insight into this topic, van Loon and colleagues wrote an excellent review on the topic (Free full-text here - https://goo.gl/Wyc1E8)
From this paper, the table below summarises the ‘amount of dietary protein to, theoretically, maximise postprandial [muscle protein synthesis] MPS’

Q: Is SOY OK?

Joseph Agu: Elite Nutrition Coaching - ENC: " Yep. one of the single best plant based sources"
« Last Edit: August 21, 2017, 16:52:39 by mp »
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #484 on: August 21, 2017, 16:50:57 »

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20006294


http://www.cpdo.net/Lederman_The_myth_of_core_stability.pdf

Conclusion

Weak trunk muscles, weak abdominals and imbalances between trunk muscles groups are
not pathological, just a normal variation. The division of the trunk into core and global
muscle system is a reductionist fantasy, which serves only to promote CS.
Weak or dysfunctional abdominal muscles will not lead to back pain.
Tensing the trunk muscles is unlikely to provide any protection against back pain or
reduce the recurrence of back pain.

Core stability exercises are no more effective than, and will not prevent injury more than,
any other forms of exercise.


Core stability exercises are no better than other forms of
exercise in reducing chronic lower back pain. Any therapeutic influence is related to the
exercise effects rather than CS issues.

There may be potential danger of damaging the spine with continuous tensing of the
trunk muscles during daily and sports activities.

Patients who have been trained to use
complex abdominal hollowing and bracing maneuvers should be discouraged from using
them.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/7/753 


The results indicate that supplying HMB promotes advantageous changes in body composition and stimulates an increase in aerobic and anaerobic capacity in combat sports athletes.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2017, 17:11:47 by mp »
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #485 on: August 21, 2017, 18:07:03 »


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821427?dopt=Abstract

The present study found no evidence that higher training frequency would induce greater benefit to maximum walking speed (i.e. functional capacity) despite a clear dose-response in dynamic 1-RM strength, at least when predominantly using machine weight-training. It appears that beneficial functional capacity improvements can be achieved through low frequency training (i.e. 1-2 times per week) in previously untrained healthy older participants.
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #486 on: August 23, 2017, 18:15:22 »



Alan Aragon:
 
"More BCAA supplementation magic has left the building.... *nail in the coffin sound* "

Lyle McDonald: "Whole protein > EAA > BCAA = dick"


--------------------------------------------------------------

"Conclusion: A physiologically-significant increase in the rate of muscle protein synthesis requires adequate availability of all amino acid precursors. The source of EAAs for muscle protein synthesis in the post-absorptive state is the free intracellular pool. Intracellular free EAAs that are available for incorporation into protein are derived from muscle protein breakdown. Under normal conditions about 70% of EAAs released by muscle protein breakdown are reincorporated into muscle protein. The efficiency of reincorporation of EAAs from protein breakdown back into muscle protein can only be increased to a limited extent. For this fundamental reason, a dietary supplement of BCAAs alone cannot support an increased rate of muscle protein synthesis. The availability of the other EAAs will rapidly become rate limiting for accelerated protein synthesis. Consistent with this perspective, the few studies in human subjects have reported decreases, rather than increases, in muscle protein synthesis after intake of BCAAs. We conclude that dietary BCAA supplements alone do not promote muscle anabolism."


https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12970-017-0184-9  Branched-chain amino acids and muscle protein synthesis in humans: myth or reality?
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #487 on: August 24, 2017, 21:22:33 »


Our new meta-analysis that investigated muscular adaptations between light (<60% 1RM) and heavy load lifting (>65% 1RM) protocols taken to failure.
 
Some primary take-homes:
1. The increases in whole muscle mass were remarkably similar between light and heavy protocols when direct measures of hypertrophy (i.e. MRI, CT, ultrasound) were used to assess changes. When looking at any statistical measure the only conclusion that can be drawn is that hypertrophy can be achieved across a spectrum of loading ranges
2. Increases in dynamic isoinertial strength (i.e. free weights and most machines) strongly favor lifting with heavy loads. You can make good gains with lighter loads, but if maximizing dynamic strength is the goal, then without question you need to lift heavy - and generally the heavier the better
3. Increases in isometric strength (tested on a dynamometer) tend to favor heavier loads, but the difference is not nearly as great as with dynamic strength. But again, if the goal is maximal strength of any kind, it appears that heavy loads need to be used at least some of the time.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28834797/
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #488 on: August 24, 2017, 22:59:50 »

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02640414.2017.1364405?journalCode=rjsp20

The physiological effects of concurrent strength and endurance training sequence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

If you need to lift and do cardio in the same session, it's probably best to lift first, even if improving your conditioning is your primary goal.
"Lower body 1RM was significantly higher when strength training preceded endurance... However, the training sequence had no impact on aerobic capacity... Sequencing strength training prior to endurance in concurrent training appears to be beneficial for lower body strength adaptations, while the improvement of aerobic capacity is not affected by training order."

Main result: When training to failure, higher loads (>60% 1RM) build greater strength, but not greater mass.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2017, 10:51:43 by mp »
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #489 on: August 27, 2017, 00:32:56 »


http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0182630

The effects of d-aspartic acid supplementation in resistance-trained men over a three month training period: A randomised controlled trial

Conclusions

The results of this paper indicate that DAA supplementation is ineffective at changing testosterone levels, or positively affecting training outcomes. Reductions in estradiol and the blunting of peripheral excitability appear unrelated to improvements from resistance training.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12970-015-0078-7

Conclusions
The present study demonstrated that a daily dose of six grams of d-aspartic acid decreased levels of total testosterone and free testosterone (D6), without any concurrent change in other hormones measured. Three grams of d-aspartic acid had no significant effect on either testosterone markers

------------------------------------------------------------



Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #490 on: August 30, 2017, 10:03:05 »


https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/doi/10.1210/jc.2017-01428/4096785/Vitamin-D-And-Testosterone-In-Healthy-Men-A?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Vitamin D treatment has no effect on TT levels in middle-aged healthy men with normal baseline TT but significantly decreased QUICKI
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #491 on: August 30, 2017, 22:20:26 »


Brad Schoenfeld
 
Most people associate the "Overload Principle" with increasing the amount of weight used over time. Certainly this is one way to overload, but it's also certainly not the only way. The crux of the Overload Principle is that you need to challenge your body beyond its present capacity to bring about an adaptation. Thus, any resistance training variable conceivably can be manipulated to accomplish this objective. You can increase volume, reduce rest intervals, train more frequently, etc - and with respect to load, you can also do more repetitions with given weight as opposed to going heavier with the same number of reps. It's important to note that the adaptations associated with altering different variables may bring about distinct adaptations, so the ultimate goal(s) of the lifter must be taken into account when deciding on when/how to manipulate them.
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #492 on: September 05, 2017, 00:01:43 »


New randomized controlled trial compares the effects of supplementing with 3 grams of leucine supplied by whey, soy, or leucine on resistance training-induced changes in muscle strength, body composition, and histological alterations

http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/9/972/htm 
Effects of Whey, Soy or Leucine Supplementation with 12 Weeks of Resistance Training on Strength, Body Composition, and Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue Histological Attributes in College-Aged Males

TAKE AWAY – This study suggests that protein and leucine supplementation are not going to have further benefits on strength or body composition in untrained adults who begin a 12-week structured resistance training program and who otherwise have a protein intake of 1.3-1.4 g/kg/d.
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #493 on: September 11, 2017, 15:34:05 »


http://endocrinenews.endocrine.org/myth-adrenal-fatigue/
Logged

mp

  • Posts: 2161
  • tervist!
    • View Profile
Re: mp siin - kui sul ei ole midagi asjalikku öelda, tee seda mujal.
« Reply #494 on: September 12, 2017, 23:10:02 »

https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12970-017-0189-4

International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrient timing
« Last Edit: September 13, 2017, 15:38:41 by mp »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 36   Go Up
 

Kaubamaja
youtube
anything